Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How can humanitarian actors set priorities under increasing restrictions?

Activity: Participating in or organising an eventParticipation in workshop, seminar

Description

The abrupt announcement -on Jan 20 2025- of closing USAID shocked global health, and its effects continue to unfurl. Critical lifesaving projects stopped suddenly; some health services vanished; some are deteriorating. Meanwhile, the USA has started to sign bilateral health agreements with some African countries, showing a preference for one-to-one agreements that bypass international, collaborative decision-making bodies in the region. Beyond the health sector, public systems that have been reinforced with the help of humanitarians and development projects are at risk of eroding. It is not only the US, though its actions were the most dramatic. More broadly, other high-income countries are decreasing contributions. In turn, the humanitarian and development sectors experience financial (and other) pressures while urgent needs continue to increase, amidst heightened instability and conflicts. How have humanitarians managed the ethical issues raised by the sudden cuts? What should their priorities be in this period of transition? How can they reconciliate the tension between demands for (global) health security and the aspiration of universal health coverage? Thinking of the future, what should a new and transformed humanitarianism look like? What should be its organizing vision and ethical basis? What will be the implications of these new relationships for health equity? Three panelists will share their insights on these questions: Lisa Eckenwiler, Mayfourth Luneta, Raffaella Ravinetto, and Samir Elharaway.
Period17 Feb 2026
Event typeSeminar
LocationHermance, SwitzerlandShow on map
Degree of RecognitionInternational