Project Details
Description
The EPINET project introduces a new approach to promote integration of technology assessment (TA) methods. It will develop methods and criteria to be used for more socially robust and efficient practices on the interfaces between TA and the world of policy makers and innovators.
At present, a large number of TA methodologies and practices exist. Many of these are based on varying - and sometimes conflicting, unclear - values, presuppositions, interests and commitments. This is problematic, insofar as differing conclusions and recommendations will follow from different methodologies and disciplines; hence the need for more integrated
approaches. However, the irreducible difference of perspectives and plurality in the field of TA needs to be recognised and used as a resource; not a problem to be done away with. A grand synthesis of methodologies would not do justice to the field and would risk negating progress already made.
EPINET introduces the concept of epistemic networks as a way of conceptualising complex developments within emerging fields of sociotechnical innovation practices. It establishes a "soft" framework within which the plurality of different TA practices can be explored in a concerted and holistic manner. Four cases are investigated along with the development of this framework: wearable sensors, cognition for technical systems, synthetic meat and smart grids. "Integrating
TA", it is claimed, is a task for empirical investigation in which implicit values of TA methodologies, disciplines and practices are spelled out and placed in relation to the practices they are meant to assess. This is the context of innovation conceptualised through the concept of emerging and future epistemic networks. EPINET develops a holistic framework for integrating assessments through gradual co-production of methodologies and concepts (centrally that of
"responsible innovation") together with innovators and policy makers. The challenges of "integrating assessments", we claim, can only be gradually worked out within such a holistic view of complex intersecting networks and practices.
At present, a large number of TA methodologies and practices exist. Many of these are based on varying - and sometimes conflicting, unclear - values, presuppositions, interests and commitments. This is problematic, insofar as differing conclusions and recommendations will follow from different methodologies and disciplines; hence the need for more integrated
approaches. However, the irreducible difference of perspectives and plurality in the field of TA needs to be recognised and used as a resource; not a problem to be done away with. A grand synthesis of methodologies would not do justice to the field and would risk negating progress already made.
EPINET introduces the concept of epistemic networks as a way of conceptualising complex developments within emerging fields of sociotechnical innovation practices. It establishes a "soft" framework within which the plurality of different TA practices can be explored in a concerted and holistic manner. Four cases are investigated along with the development of this framework: wearable sensors, cognition for technical systems, synthetic meat and smart grids. "Integrating
TA", it is claimed, is a task for empirical investigation in which implicit values of TA methodologies, disciplines and practices are spelled out and placed in relation to the practices they are meant to assess. This is the context of innovation conceptualised through the concept of emerging and future epistemic networks. EPINET develops a holistic framework for integrating assessments through gradual co-production of methodologies and concepts (centrally that of
"responsible innovation") together with innovators and policy makers. The challenges of "integrating assessments", we claim, can only be gradually worked out within such a holistic view of complex intersecting networks and practices.
| Acronym | EU412 |
|---|---|
| Status | Finished |
| Effective start/end date | 1/05/12 → 30/04/15 |
Keywords
- Interdisciplinary Study of the Law
- Meta-Law
Flemish discipline codes in use since 2023
- Law and legal studies
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
-
Make way for the robots! Human- and machine-centricity in constituting a European Public-Private Partnership
Rommetveit, K., Van Dijk, N. & Gunnarsdóttir , K., 31 Mar 2020, In: Minerva. 58, 1, p. 47-69 23 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile23 Citations (Scopus)153 Downloads (Pure) -
Εκτίμηση αντικτύπου σχετικά με την προστασία δεδομένων στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση: Συμπληρώνοντας το νέο νομικό πλαίσιο προς μία πιο ισχυρή προστασία των φυσικών προσώπων
Kloza, D., Van Dijk, N., Gellert, R. M., Borocz, I. M., Tanas, A., Mantovani, E., Quinn, P. & Ioannidis, N. (Translator), 9 Jul 2020, d.pia.lab Policy Brief, 1/2017, p. 1-8 8 p.Translated title of the contribution :Data protection impact assessments in the European Union: complementing the new legal framework towards a more robust protection of individuals Research output: Contribution to specialist/vulgarizing publication › Article › Specialist
Open AccessFile174 Downloads (Pure) -
Working responsibly across boundaries: practical and theoretical lessons
Rommetveit, K., Van Dijk, N., Gunnarsdóttir , K., O'Riordan, K., Gutwirth, S., Strand, R. & Wynne, B., 2019, International Handbook of Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource. vom Schomberg, R. & Hankins, J. (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., p. 83-100Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review