Abstract
Introduction: Previous registry studies indicated that repeat HLA mismatches (RMM) were associated with a greater risk of graft loss. Given
current routine use of sensitive antibody detection assays that can prevent
the transplantation of RMM in hosts with detectable levels of donor-specific
antibodies, we hypothesized that RMM would no longer be associated
with graft loss in a contemporary cohort of second kidney transplant (2nd
KT) recipients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Collaborative
Transplant Study database including data of 6711 patients who had
received a 2nd KT between 2010 and 2021, with at least one HLA-A, -B
or -DR mismatch.
Results: No increased risk for graft loss was observed for 2nd KT with
a Class I RMM. For 2nd KT with a Class II RMM, 1- and 5-year deathcensored graft survival was significantly lower (88.8% and 80.0%) compared to recipients with no RMM (93.2% and 84.3%, P=0.003 and P=0.02)
(Figure). The multivariate Cox regression analysis hazard ratio for graft
loss in the first year after transplantation was 1.98 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.86;
P<0.001) for Class II RMM compared to no RMM recipients. The hazard
ratio increased to 2.72 (95% CI 1.56 – 4.73; P<0.001) for sensitized recipients (latest PRA>0%) with a Class II RMM.
Discussion: Our observations suggest that HLA Class I RMM with
the first donor do not need to be systematically avoided. In contrast, HLA
Class II RMM still have a detrimental impact on survival of 2nd KT, despite
the widespread availability of Luminex technology.
current routine use of sensitive antibody detection assays that can prevent
the transplantation of RMM in hosts with detectable levels of donor-specific
antibodies, we hypothesized that RMM would no longer be associated
with graft loss in a contemporary cohort of second kidney transplant (2nd
KT) recipients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Collaborative
Transplant Study database including data of 6711 patients who had
received a 2nd KT between 2010 and 2021, with at least one HLA-A, -B
or -DR mismatch.
Results: No increased risk for graft loss was observed for 2nd KT with
a Class I RMM. For 2nd KT with a Class II RMM, 1- and 5-year deathcensored graft survival was significantly lower (88.8% and 80.0%) compared to recipients with no RMM (93.2% and 84.3%, P=0.003 and P=0.02)
(Figure). The multivariate Cox regression analysis hazard ratio for graft
loss in the first year after transplantation was 1.98 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.86;
P<0.001) for Class II RMM compared to no RMM recipients. The hazard
ratio increased to 2.72 (95% CI 1.56 – 4.73; P<0.001) for sensitized recipients (latest PRA>0%) with a Class II RMM.
Discussion: Our observations suggest that HLA Class I RMM with
the first donor do not need to be systematically avoided. In contrast, HLA
Class II RMM still have a detrimental impact on survival of 2nd KT, despite
the widespread availability of Luminex technology.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Transplantation |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2024 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '360.8: Repeat HLA Class II but not Class I mismatches are associated with increased loss of second kidney grafts: A contemporary Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver