Abstract
Background
Mechanical forces and joint misalignment are considered risk factors for the development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Early detection of KOA and distinction between lateral and medial compartment overloading (CO), might be important to inform appropriate preventative interventions. This study evaluated reliability and validity of a test battery consisting of ten clinical tests to predict knee CO.
Methods
Independent observers examined 30 participants with symptoms of KOA. Inter-rater reliability of the ten tests, as well as the anticipated CO based on the whole test battery, was determined. All participants received a SPECT-CT, which served as reference standard for CO. The agreement for CO between SPECT-CT and clinical examination was assessed to determine criterion validity.
Results
The Kappa coefficients () for the ten individual clinical tests ranged from 0.19 to 0.80. The for determining CO was 0.52 (95% CI = 0.28–0.76). The agreement for CO between SPECT-CT and clinical examination (i.e. criterion validity) yielded a of 0.26 (95% CI = −0.06 - 0.58). Logistic regression indicated that valgus alignment was strongly related with lateral CO. No other relationships were found between individual tests and CO.
Conclusion
Accurate measurement of frontal plane knee angle is important to determine CO. This particular test yielded good reliability, but low validity. Reliability of the nine remaining clinical tests was fair to moderate. Criterion validity of the clinical examination to predict CO was low. Therefore, this test battery in its current form cannot be used in practice to determine CO.
Mechanical forces and joint misalignment are considered risk factors for the development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Early detection of KOA and distinction between lateral and medial compartment overloading (CO), might be important to inform appropriate preventative interventions. This study evaluated reliability and validity of a test battery consisting of ten clinical tests to predict knee CO.
Methods
Independent observers examined 30 participants with symptoms of KOA. Inter-rater reliability of the ten tests, as well as the anticipated CO based on the whole test battery, was determined. All participants received a SPECT-CT, which served as reference standard for CO. The agreement for CO between SPECT-CT and clinical examination was assessed to determine criterion validity.
Results
The Kappa coefficients () for the ten individual clinical tests ranged from 0.19 to 0.80. The for determining CO was 0.52 (95% CI = 0.28–0.76). The agreement for CO between SPECT-CT and clinical examination (i.e. criterion validity) yielded a of 0.26 (95% CI = −0.06 - 0.58). Logistic regression indicated that valgus alignment was strongly related with lateral CO. No other relationships were found between individual tests and CO.
Conclusion
Accurate measurement of frontal plane knee angle is important to determine CO. This particular test yielded good reliability, but low validity. Reliability of the nine remaining clinical tests was fair to moderate. Criterion validity of the clinical examination to predict CO was low. Therefore, this test battery in its current form cannot be used in practice to determine CO.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 500-506 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies |
| Volume | 27 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We would like to thank Isabella Laouenan, Jürg Merz and Urs Baumann for being part of the rater team and for making a valuable contribution to the development of the test battery.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis
- Compartment overloading
- Clinical examination
- Single photon emission computed tomography computed tomography