Abstract
Since the beginning of the development of the so-called embedded value methodology, actuaries have been using the present value of future profits as yardstick when valuing life insurance activities. However, using profits as a fundamental input is subject to criticism because profits are no actual cash flows. In an attempt to create more transparency and robustness the CFO forum (2008) has set a definition for market consistent embedded value (MCEV). Nevertheless, this definition refers again to the present value of future profits. In this note we show that such a definition is misleading and, instead of creating more transparency, it could end up in creating more confusion.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 54-59 |
Number of pages <span style="color:red"p> <font size="1.5"> ✽ </span> </font> | 6 |
Journal | Belgian Actuarial Bulletin |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- embedded value
- MCEV
- fair value
- cash flow projections
- business valuation
- profits
- cash flows