An analytical comparison of three immunoassay platforms for subpicomolar detection of protein biomarker GAD65

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A disproportional increase of circulating GAD65 within hours from an intraportal islet allotransplantation has been validated as biomarker of beta cell loss and poor functional outcome. More sensitive assays are, however, needed to allow detection of episodes of subtle beta cell loss during late-stage graft rejection or in the peri-onset period of type 1 diabetes. We applied the same sandwich monoclonal antibody couple reactive towards the C- and N-terminus of GAD65 on three advanced immunoassay platforms-the Cytometric Bead Array (CBA, Becton, Dickinson and Company), ElectroChemiLuminescence ImmunoAssay (ECLIA, Meso Scale Discovery) and digital ELISA technology (Single Molecule Array-SIMOA, Quanterix. We then compared analytical performance (linearity, imprecision, limit of detection and functional sensitivity), correlation of results, and practicality. All evaluated techniques showed linearity up to at least 500 ng/dL (76.9 pmol/L). SIMOA achieved the lowest imprecision. The 3 platforms correlate well with each other and could all detect subpicomolar concentrations of GAD65 in plasma, but only SIMOA and CBA could quantify down to that range. SIMOA can achieve the highest sample throughput. The three methods tested allow sensitive detection of GAD65, but SIMOA appears best suited for automated quantification of subpicomolar concentrations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0193670
Number of pages10
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An analytical comparison of three immunoassay platforms for subpicomolar detection of protein biomarker GAD65'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this