Aus der Gutachtenpraxis: Zur Begutachtung von Nasengerüstfrakturen

Translated title of the contribution: From the Experts Office: Typical expert misjudgments in nasal fractures: Typical expert misjudgments in nasal fractures

T. Brusis, O. Michel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In insurance and legal proceedings Nose traumas are usually treated by 3 possible consequential damages: by one restriction of the olfactory capacity, a obstruction of nasal breathing and finally, in order to avoid any cosmetic Disfigurement. When answering the question of coherence must be taken into account, that applicants are often responsible for their nasal symptoms are a past history of event, since knowledge of an investment-related or non-traumatic development is missing due to other causes. This applies to all the more so when recognition of a claimed nasal trauma a Compensation or insurance cover can be obtained.
Translated title of the contributionFrom the Experts Office: Typical expert misjudgments in nasal fractures: Typical expert misjudgments in nasal fractures
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)724-730
Number of pages7
JournalLaryngo- Rhino- Otologie
Volume99
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From the Experts Office: Typical expert misjudgments in nasal fractures: Typical expert misjudgments in nasal fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this