Breast cancer preoperative 18FDG-PET, overall survival prognostic separation compared with the lymph node ratio

Vincent Vinh - Hung, Hendrik Everaert, Olena Gorobets, Hilde Van Parijs, Guy Verfaillie, Marian Vanhoeij, Guy Storme, Christel Fontaine, Jan Lamote, Justine Perrin, Karim Farid, Nam P Nguyen, Claire Verschraegen, Mark De Ridder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)


Purpose: To evaluate the overall survival prognostic value of preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer, as compared with the lymph node ratio (LNR). Methods: Data were abstracted at a median follow-up 14.7 years from a retrospective cohort of 104 patients who underwent PET imaging before curative surgery. PET-Axillary|Sternal was classified as PET-positive if hypermetabolism was visualized in ipsilateral nodal axillary and/or sternal region, else as PET-negative. The differences of 15 years restricted mean survival time ∆ RMST according to PET and LNR were computed from Kaplan–Meier overall survival. The effect of PET and other patients' characteristics was analyzed through rankit normalization, which provides with Cox regression the Royston–Sauerbrei D measure of separation to compare the characteristics (0 indicating no prognostic value). Multivariate analysis of the normalized characteristics used stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion. Results: In Kaplan–Meier analysis, LNR > 0.20 versus ≤ 0.20 showed ∆ RMST = 3.4 years, P = 0.003. PET-Axillary|Sternal positivity versus PET-negative showed a ∆ RMST = 2.6 years, P = 0.008. In Cox univariate analyses, LNR appeared as topmost prognostic separator, D = 1.50, P < 0.001. PET ranked below but was also highly significant, D = 1.02, P = 0.009. In multivariate analyses, LNR and PET-Axillary|Sternal were colinear and mutually exclusive. PET-Axillary|Sternal improved as prognosticator in a model excluding lymph nodes, yielding a normalized hazard ratio of 2.44, P = 0.062. Conclusion: Pathological lymph node assessment remains the gold standard of prognosis. However, PET appears as a valuable surrogate in univariate analysis at 15-year follow-up. There was a trend towards significance in multivariate analysis that warrants further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)956-968
Number of pages13
JournalBreast Cancer
Issue number4
Early online date10 Mar 2021
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Breast cancer preoperative 18FDG-PET, overall survival prognostic separation compared with the lymph node ratio'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this