Abstract
Election debates are key campaign events that allow citizens to compare politicians' issue positions side-by-side. While debate moderators try to keep candidates on-topic to contrast issue positions, candidates can try to shift the debate to off-topic issues instead. Election debates thus provide a unique setting to study candidates' issue emphasis. In this context, we study: who veers off-topic, on which issues, and when? Our theory-driven quantitative content analysis of 24 Belgian election debates (1985-2019) shows that different candidates are equally likely to veer off-topic, but when they do, they emphasize their party's core issues and follow previous off-topic speaking turns.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 755-774 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media |
Volume | 67 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the KU Leuven Internal Funders under Grant C14/17/022; and FWO and F.R.S.-FNRS Excellence of Science (EOS) under Grant G0F0218N.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Broadcast Education Association.