Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework

Ardashel Latsuzbaia, Davy Vanden Broeck, Severien Van Keer, Steven Weyers, Wiebren A A Tjalma, Jean Doyen, Gilbert Donders, Philippe De Sutter, Alex Vorsters, Eliana Peeters, Marc Arbyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The VALHUDES framework (NCT03064087) was established to evaluate the clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-samples compared with HPV testing on matched clinician-taken cervical samples. Women referred to colposcopy due to previous cervical abnormalities were recruited at five Belgian colposcopy centers. A total of 486 pairs of matched cervical samples and vaginal self-samples were included in the analysis (228 collected with Evalyn Brush and 258 with Qvintip). The dry vaginal brushes were transferred into 20 mL ThinPrep PreservCyt solution. All specimens were tested with the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT). Testing on vaginal and cervical specimens was considered the index and comparator tests, respectively, and colposcopy and histology as the reference standard. The clinical sensitivity for CIN2+ of Abbott RT (cutoff ≤32 cycle number [CN]) on vaginal self-samples (Evalyn Brush and Qvintip combined) was 8% lower than on the cervical clinician-collected samples (ratio = 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98]), while the specificity was similar (ratio = 1.04 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.12]). Sensitivity (ratio = 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.02]) and specificity (ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 0.995 to 1.23]) on Evalyn Brush samples was similar to cervical, while on Qvintip samples, the sensitivity was 12% lower than cervical samples (ratio = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.998]) with similar specificity (0.99 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.10]). Exploratory cutoff optimization (cutoff ≤35 CN) resulted in an improvement of the relative sensitivity (self-sampling versus clinician sampling: ratio = 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.02]) but yielded a loss in relative specificity (ratio = 0.92 [0.85 to 1.00]). The clinical accuracy of Abbott RT differed from the self-sampling device. However, after cutoff optimization, the sensitivity on self-samples taken with either of two vaginal brushes became similar to clinician-collected samples. IMPORTANCE Self-samples are becoming a crucial part of HPV-based cervical cancer screening programs to reach nonattendee women and increase screening coverage. Therefore, the VALHUDES framework was established to validate and evaluate HPV tests and devices on self-samples. Here, in the present manuscript, we evaluated the accuracy of the RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT) on two different vaginal devices to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade two or higher (CIN2+). The study results demonstrated that the Abbott RT assay is similarly accurate on vaginal self-samples as on matched clinician-taken cervical samples after adjusting cutoff values. Moreover, we observed that some vaginal devices perform better than others in CIN2+ detection. We also underline the necessity of standardization and validation of general workflow and sample handling procedures for vaginal self-samples.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0163122
Number of pages11
JournalMicrobiology spectrum
Volume10
Issue number5
Early online date1 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The VALHUDES project is a researcher-induced study, designed by Sciensano (Principal Investigator; Brussels, Belgium), CEV (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium), and AML (Antwerp, Belgium). HPV assays and device manufacturers can participate in the VALHUDES framework by contributing financial support and equipment for laboratory testing and statistical analysis. This research was supported by a grant from Abbott Laboratories (Abbott GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany), Novosanis NV (Wijnegem, Belgium), University of Antwerp (Antwerp, Belgium). The study group received sample collection devices from Rovers Medical Devices B.V. (Oss, The Netherlands) and Aprovix AB (Uppsala, Sweden).

Funding Information:
M.A. and A.L. were supported by the RISCC Network (grant no. 8478459) Horizon 2020 Program for Research and Innovation of the European Commission (Brussels, Belgium). S.V.K. was supported by a junior postdoctoral fellowship of the Research Foundation-Flanders (1240220N).

Funding Information:
Editor William Lainhart, University of Arizona/ Banner Health Copyright © 2022 Latsuzbaia et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Address correspondence to Marc Arbyn, [email protected]. The authors declare a conflict of interest. The VALHUDES project is a researcher-induced study, designed by Sciensano (Principal Investigator; Brussels, Belgium), CEV (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium), and AML (Antwerp, Belgium). HPV assays and devices manufacturers can participate in the VALHUDES framework contributing financial support and equipment for laboratory testing and statistical analysis. This research was supported by a grant from Abbott Laboratories (Abbott GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany), Novosanis NV (Wijnegem, Belgium), University of Antwerp (Antwerp, Belgium). The study group received sample collection devices from Rovers Medical Devices B.V. (Oss, The Netherlands) and Aprovix AB (Uppsala, Sweden). Received 15 May 2022 Accepted 8 July 2022 Published 1 September 2022

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Latsuzbaia et al.

Copyright:
Copyright 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis
  • Papillomaviridae/genetics
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Early Detection of Cancer/methods
  • Specimen Handling/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this