CTG repeat instability in a human embryonic stem cell line carrying the myotonic dystrophy type 1 mutation.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESC) are considered to be an indefinite source of self-renewing cells that can differentiate into all types of cells of the human body and could be used in regenerative medicine, drug discovery and as a model for studying early developmental biology. hESC carrying disease-causing mutations hold promise as a tool to investigate mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. In this report, we describe the behaviour of an expanded CTG repeat in the 3' untranslated region of the DMPK gene in VUB03_DM1, a hESC line carrying the myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) mutation compared with the normal CTG repeat in two hESC lines VUB01 and VUB04_CF. Expanded CTG repeats were detected by small amount PCR, small pool PCR and Southern blot analysis in consecutive passages of VUB03_DM1. An important instability of the CTG repeat was detected during prolonged in vitro culture, showing stepwise increases of the repeat number in consecutive passages as well as a higher range of variability. This variability was present in cells of different colonies of the same passage and even within single colonies. The high repeat instability is in contrast to the previously observed stability of the repeat in preimplantation embryos and in fetuses during the first trimester of pregnancy. This in vitro culture of affected hESC represents a valuable model for studying the biology of repeat instability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-412
Number of pages13
JournalMolecular Human Reproduction
Volume14
Issue numberJuly
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

Keywords

  • human embryonic stem cells
  • myotonic dystrophy type 1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CTG repeat instability in a human embryonic stem cell line carrying the myotonic dystrophy type 1 mutation.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this