@article{a64930c5cd7f4679942bc736a0edc2f7,
title = "Cycling infrastructure for All. EPACs included?",
abstract = "A modal shift to electric pedal-assisted cycles (EPACs) can help with reaching the transport emission goals of the European Green Deal. With the rising sales of EPACs in Europe, a lack of appropriate (electric) cycling infrastructure remains a major barrier for many potential users. This paper discusses the results of a survey about the requirements of (potential) cyclists to design a better cycling infrastructure. The differences in requirements for non-cyclists vs. cyclists and electric cyclists vs. conventional cyclists are discussed using statistical analysis. The key findings are that cyclists and non-cyclists both require wide quality cycling infrastructure with safe crossing points, secure bicycle parking and smart traffic lights. Non-cyclists{\textquoteright} requirements significantly differ from cyclists{\textquoteright} on 12 items, of which rain cover while cycling and parking spots for the car are the most noteworthy. There is (but) one significant difference between the requirements of EPAC users and conventional cyclists: the need for charging points for EPACs along the cycle route. ",
keywords = "bicycle, e-bike, infrastructure, Light electric vehicle",
author = "{Van den Steen}, Nikolaas and {de Geus}, Bas and Jan Cappelle and Lieselot Vanhaverbeke",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
day = "22",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.3390/ wevj13050074",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "World Electric Vehicle Journal",
issn = "2032-6653",
publisher = "The World Electric Vehicle Association (WEVA)",
number = "5",
}