Development of a new evaluation framework for urban and regional mobility projects

Jeroen Bulckaen, Imre Keseru, Ceri Donovan, Huw Davies, Cathy Macharis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paper

Abstract

Transport planners and authorities across Europe use several different methodologies and tools to evaluate mobility investments or measures. The existing approaches, whilst clear in their objectives, demonstrate a wide variation in procedures, coverage of transport modes, comprehensiveness, ease-of-use and flexibility. This paper discusses the development of a new evaluation framework for urban mobility projects. The framework allows policy makers and transport planners to execute an impact assessment in a comprehensive, user-friendly and flexible way.
The developed framework consist of three evaluation strands: the assessment of sustainability by a multi-criteria analysis (MCA), the assessment of stakeholder preferences (MAMCA) and the assessment of policy success by target monitoring. Besides these evaluation tools, the framework also consists of a criteria and indicator framework. These are all used within the three evaluation tools to assess the impact.
Translated title of the contributionDe ontwikkeling van een nieuw evaluatiekader voor stedelijke en regionale mobiliteitsprojecten
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCURRENT ISSUES IN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the BIVEC/GIBET transport research days 2015
EditorsSoora Rasouli, Harry Timmermans
Place of PublicationEindhoven
Pages67-76
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - May 2015
EventBIVEC/GIBET Transport Research Days 2015 - Eindhoven, Netherlands
Duration: 28 May 201529 Jun 2015

Conference

ConferenceBIVEC/GIBET Transport Research Days 2015
Country/TerritoryNetherlands
CityEindhoven
Period28/05/1529/06/15

Keywords

  • sustainable urban mobility
  • evaluation framework
  • criteria
  • NISTO

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a new evaluation framework for urban and regional mobility projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this