Diversity and Social Justice, Religious symbols in public office’

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingMeeting abstract (Book)

Abstract

In the footsteps of the French ban on cospicious religious symbols in state schools, debates on the understanding of secularity and state-neutrality towards religion and faith in the Belgian context have revived. This paper focuses on some core questions and arguments in the current debate over the wearing of visible religious symbols and dress in employment in public office in the Belgian context. It outlines and discusses different and intersecting perspectives and policy-domains that are relevant to the issue: 1) diversity policies aiming to address social exclusion and labour-market discrimination of migrants and Muslims, 2) multicultural policies and anti-discrimination policies 3) state-neutrality and the relation of the Belgian state vis à vis religion and life stances and 4) women s emancipation and gender equality. Some critical questions regarding the use of the concept of inclusive neutrality, as it is currently advocated as an alternative to exclusive or strict state neutrality, are raised. We further comment on other related tendencies and concepts such as active neutrality and active pluralism.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication11th International Metropolis Conference. Paths and Crossroads, Moving People, Changing Places, 2-6 October, 2006, Lisboa Portugal
Publication statusPublished - 2006
EventFinds and Results from the Swedish Cyprus Expedition: A Gender Perspective at the Medelhavsmuseet - Stockholm, Sweden
Duration: 21 Sept 200925 Sept 2009

Conference

ConferenceFinds and Results from the Swedish Cyprus Expedition: A Gender Perspective at the Medelhavsmuseet
Country/TerritorySweden
CityStockholm
Period21/09/0925/09/09

Keywords

  • religious symbols
  • public office
  • multiculturalism
  • Belgium
  • gender

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diversity and Social Justice, Religious symbols in public office’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this