Do Internal Institutions Matter? Socialization and International Bureaucrats

Zuzana Murdoch, Hussein Kassim, Sara Connolly, Benny Geys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A key component of (neo)functionalist and constructivist approaches to the study of international organizations concerns staff socialization. Existing analyses of how, or indeed whether, staff develop more pro-internationalist attitudes over time draw predominantly on cross-sectional data. Yet, such data cannot address (self-)selection issues or capture the inherently temporal nature of attitude change. This article proposes an innovative approach to the study of international socialization using an explicitly longitudinal design. Analyzing two waves of a large-scale survey conducted within the European Commission in 2008 and 2014, it examines the beliefs and values of the same individuals over time and exploits exogenous organizational changes to identify causal effects. Furthermore, the article theorizes and assesses specified scope conditions affecting socialization processes. Showing that international institutions do in fact influence value acquisition by individual bureaucrats, our results contest the widely held view that international organizations are not a socializing environment. Our analysis also demonstrates that age at entry and gender significantly affect the intensity of such value change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)852-877
Number of pages26
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do Internal Institutions Matter? Socialization and International Bureaucrats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this