Dominance, Overextensions and the Conjunction Effect in Different Syntactic Phrasings of Concept Conjunctions

Gert Storms, Wim Ruts, Anneloes Vandenbroucke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies are described in which the membership ratings of relative clause descriptions of concept conjunctions (such as pets that are also birds) are compared to membership ratings of adjective-noun and noun-noun phrasings of the same conjunctions. The results show that the different phrasings of the conjunction carry the same meaning as reflected in the membership ratings. Furthermore, it is shown that the different phrasings also result in similar patterns of dominance and overextensions. The results also demonstrate that the extent to which the conjunction effect described by Smith and Osherson (1984; Osherson & Smith, 1982; Smith, Osherson, Rips, & Keane, 1988) is found in the data is related not only to the incompatibility of the constituents, but also to the dominance effect. In summary, our results provide evidence for a unitary representation of conjunctive concepts, regardless of the syntactic phrasing of the conjunction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-372
Number of pages36
JournalEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume10
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dominance, Overextensions and the Conjunction Effect in Different Syntactic Phrasings of Concept Conjunctions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this