Ethics and Radiological protection

Gilbert Eggermont (Editor), Bernard Feltz (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is recommending measures to guarantee the health of the public exposed to ionizing radiation. During the last years, ICRP proposed fundamental changes in its protection approach.

What is at stake in this evolution? What is the ethical dimension of radiological protection and how can we frame the process options of ICRP within ethical theories?

The ICRP evolution is here analyzed from different standpoints. The three successive approaches of radiological protection - justification, optimisation and limits - are focused on ethical aspects by physicists, biologists, engineers, medical physicians, philosophers, ethicists, psychologists and economists. These approaches also take place in the context of precaution and intergenerational responsibility.

Recent tendencies in ICRP were paying less attention to justification and optimisation while decreasing the status of limits. The authors express convergences in their concern for a degradation of this unique system of protection based on the precautionary ALARA principle. The hierarchy and complementarities of the triple system of radiological protection are pointed out to be crucial both from ethical and political points of view.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEthics and Radiological Protection
EditorsGilbert Eggermont, Bernard Feltz
PublisherAcademia-Bruylant
Pages1-234
Number of pages234
Volume2008
ISBN (Print)978-2-87209-894-1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2007

Publication series

Name
Number03

Bibliographical note

Gilbert Eggermont and Bernard Feltz

Keywords

  • radiation protection
  • ethics
  • ICRP
  • optimisation
  • justification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics and Radiological protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this