Eu agencies: does the Meroni doctrine make sense?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Two decades ago the process of agencification of the EU administration was initiated and has gained momentum ever since. Today there are about 30 agencies scattered across the EU, active in different policy fields and entrusted with different tasks. In a first part this article looks at the history and rationale of agency creation and at the political framework in which EU agencies operate. In a second part, building on the definition and classification of agencies by Griller and Orator, a closer look will be taken at the institutional position of the EU agencies. Because the creation of agencies was neither excluded nor foreseen in the Founding Treaties most authors search for clarification in the 1958 Meroni ruling of the CJEU This article challenges this line of reasoning by identifying a number of problems. Furthermore this article also challenges the way in which a number of authors deduct the principle of institutional balance from the Meroni ruling, applying it to the functioning of agencies, thereby misconstruing the original concern which the Court sought to express through this principle. In the last part the article links this legal discussion to the political discussions on the future framework for the agencies, identifying a critical role for the Commission in supporting the above mentioned dominant legal reasoning.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)281-305
    Number of pages25
    JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Eu agencies: does the Meroni doctrine make sense?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this