Abstract
Purpose: To examine whether four different generations (Silent Generation, Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y) hold different beliefs about career. Career type, career success evaluation and importance attached to organizational security were scrutinized for each generation.
Design/methodology/approach: 750 people completed a vignette task, rating the career success of 32 fictitious people. Each vignette contained a different combination of five career features (functional level, salary, number of promotions, promotion speed and satisfaction) at two levels (low and high). Furthermore, several items were added in order to determine each participant s career type and the extent to which they attached importance to organizational security.
Findings: The majority of participants still had rather traditional careers, although younger generations seemed to exhibit larger discrepancies between career preferences and actual career situation. Overall, satisfaction appeared to be the overriding criterion used to evaluate other people s career success. No significant differences were found between generations. With regard to importance attached to organizational security, the Silent Generation and Generation Y scored significantly higher than the other generations.
Research limitations/implications: The convenience sampling strategy led to large differences in sample size per generation. Using a vignette design limited the amount and richness of information that could be offered to participants. Perhaps other criteria relevant to real-life career success evaluation were not incorporated in this study.
Originality/value of paper: This study raises questions about the validity of career success operationalizations frequently used in research. It is the first study that examines career success evaluation by means of vignettes.
Design/methodology/approach: 750 people completed a vignette task, rating the career success of 32 fictitious people. Each vignette contained a different combination of five career features (functional level, salary, number of promotions, promotion speed and satisfaction) at two levels (low and high). Furthermore, several items were added in order to determine each participant s career type and the extent to which they attached importance to organizational security.
Findings: The majority of participants still had rather traditional careers, although younger generations seemed to exhibit larger discrepancies between career preferences and actual career situation. Overall, satisfaction appeared to be the overriding criterion used to evaluate other people s career success. No significant differences were found between generations. With regard to importance attached to organizational security, the Silent Generation and Generation Y scored significantly higher than the other generations.
Research limitations/implications: The convenience sampling strategy led to large differences in sample size per generation. Using a vignette design limited the amount and richness of information that could be offered to participants. Perhaps other criteria relevant to real-life career success evaluation were not incorporated in this study.
Originality/value of paper: This study raises questions about the validity of career success operationalizations frequently used in research. It is the first study that examines career success evaluation by means of vignettes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 907-928 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Managerial Psychology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 23 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- Career theory
- Career success
- Generational differences
- Vignette study