Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting

D. Henderickx, K. Maetens, Eric Soetens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Briand (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1243–1256, 1998) and Briand and Klein (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:228–241, 1987) demonstrated that spatial cueing effects are larger for detecting conjunction of features than for detecting simple features when spatial attention is oriented exogenously, and not when attention is oriented endogenously. Their results were interpreted as if only exogenous attention affects the posterior spatial attention system that performs the feature binding function attributed to spatial attention by Treisman’s feature integration theory (FIT; 1980). In a series of 6 experiments, we attempted to replicate Briand’s findings. Manipulations of distractor string size and symmetry of stimulus presentation left and right from fixation were implemented in Posner’s cueing paradigm. The data indicate that both exogenous and endogenous cueing address the same attentional mechanism needed for feature binding. The results also limit the generalisability of Briand’s proposal concerning the role of exogenous attention in feature integration. Furthermore, the importance to control the effect of unintended attentional capture in a cueing task is demonstrated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-254
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Research
Volume74
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2010

Keywords

  • chronic skin diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this