Abstract

The judgement examined market definition and abusive practices in mobile application distribution agreements (MADAs), revenue sharing agreements (RSAs) and anti-fragmentation agreements (AFAs) by Google. The General Court largely upheld the Commission's decision, highlighting the interconnectedness of Google's anti-competitive restraints and categorised them as a single continuing infringement. The case provides a typical example of ‘competition for data’ between data ecosystems and has broader implications, even challenging Google's business model and discussing the burden of proof in exclusivity rebate cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-130
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Data Protection Law Review
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • antitrust
  • data ecosystem

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Google's Antitrust Quandary: Data Ecosystem Building'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this