Implantable loop recorders in patients with Brugada syndrome: the BruLoop study

Marco Bergonti, Frederic Sacher, Elena Arbelo, Lia Crotti, Avi Sabbag, Michela Casella, Johan Saenen, Andrea Rossi, Cinzia Monaco, Luigi Pannone, Paolo Compagnucci, Vincenzo Russo, Eyal Heller, Amato Santoro, Paola Berne, Antonio Bisignani, Enrico Baldi, Olivier Van Leuven, Federico Migliore, Lorenzo MarconFederica Dagradi, Irene Sfondrini, Federico Landra, Angelo Comune, María Cespón-Fernández, Martina Nesti, Francesco Santoro, Michele Magnocavallo, Alessandro Vicentini, Sergio Conti, Valentina Ribatti, Pedro Brugada, Carlo de Asmundis, Josep Brugada, Claudio Tondo, Peter J Schwartz, Michel Haissaguerre, Angelo Auricchio, Giulio Conte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Available data on continuous rhythm monitoring by implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are scarce. The aim of this multi-centre study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical implication of a continuous rhythm monitoring strategy by ILRs in a large cohort of BrS patients and to assess the precise arrhythmic cause of syncopal episodes.

METHODS: A total of 370 patients with BrS and ILRs (mean age 43.5 ± 15.9, 33.8% female, 74.1% symptomatic) from 18 international centers were included. Patients were followed with continuous rhythm monitoring for a median follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS: During follow-up, an arrhythmic event was recorded in 30.7% of symptomatic patients [18.6% atrial arrhythmias (AAs), 10.2% bradyarrhythmias (BAs), and 7.3% ventricular arrhythmias (VAs)]. In patients with recurrent syncope, the aetiology was arrhythmic in 22.4% (59.3% BAs, 25.0% VAs, and 15.6% AAs). The ILR led to drug therapy initiation in 11.4%, ablation procedure in 10.9%, implantation of a pacemaker in 2.5%, and a cardioverter-defibrillator in 8%. At multivariate analysis, the presence of symptoms [hazard ratio (HR) 2.5, P = .001] and age >50 years (HR 1.7, P = .016) were independent predictors of arrhythmic events, while inducibility of ventricular fibrillation at the electrophysiological study (HR 9.0, P < .001) was a predictor of VAs.

CONCLUSIONS: ILR detects arrhythmic events in nearly 30% of symptomatic BrS patients, leading to appropriate therapy in 70% of them. The most commonly detected arrhythmias are AAs and BAs, while VAs are detected only in 7% of cases. Symptom status can be used to guide ILR implantation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1255-1265
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume45
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Keywords

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac/complications
  • Brugada Syndrome/complications
  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Electrocardiography/methods
  • Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/methods
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implantable loop recorders in patients with Brugada syndrome: the BruLoop study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this