Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

In vitro activity of ceftaroline and comparators against bacterial isolates collected globally from patients with skin infections

Denis Piérard, Gregory G Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the antimicrobial activities of ceftaroline and comparators against bacterial isolates from patients with skin and skin-structure infections (2015-2018).

METHODS: A central laboratory performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing according to CLSI broth microdilution methodology. EUCAST breakpoints were used.

RESULTS: Isolates were collected in Europe (14 408 isolates; 53.9%), Asia/South Pacific (SP) (5317; 19.9%), Latin America (4268; 16.0%) and Africa/Middle East (ME) (2753; 10.3%). In all regions, all 7950 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline and vancomycin; susceptibility to daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin and tigecycline was ≥99.6%. Susceptibility of all 9174 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates to daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, tigecycline and vancomycin was ≥97.7%, with 90.8-96.5% susceptible to ceftaroline. The ceftaroline MIC90 was 0.008 mg/L against Streptococcus pyogenes, 0.015-0.03 mg/L against Streptococcus agalactiae and 0.008-0.015 mg/L against Streptococcus dysgalactiae. All β-haemolytic streptococci were susceptible to vancomycin. Susceptibility of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-negative Escherichia coli to ceftaroline ranged from 67.0% in Asia/SP to 91.0% in Africa/ME; susceptibility to amikacin, meropenem and tigecycline was ≥96.7% in all regions. Susceptibility of ESBL-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftaroline ranged from 78.4% in Europe to 83.2% in Africa/ME, and among ESBL-negative Klebsiella oxytoca was 76.3% in Asia/SP and 89.0-93.5% in other regions. Among ESBL-negative K. pneumoniae and ESBL-negative K. oxytoca, susceptibility was highest to amikacin (93.7-96.4% and 95.7-100%, respectively) and meropenem (89.7-97.4% and 98.3-100%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Ceftaroline was active against the Gram-positive isolates collected. Susceptibility of ESBL-negative Gram-negative isolates showed regional variations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-10
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of global antimicrobial resistance
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords

  • ATLAS
  • Ceftaroline
  • Skin infection
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Surveillance
  • β-Haemolytic streptococci

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro activity of ceftaroline and comparators against bacterial isolates collected globally from patients with skin infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this