Injury Risk Analysis among Judo Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities

Jose Morales, Misaki Iteya, James Mulroy, Rafael Kons, Jozef Simenko, David H. Fukuda, Raquel Escobar-Molina, Myriam Guerra-Balic, Emanuela Pierantozzi, Marta Moragas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to evaluate injury prevalence, incidence rate, and burden in judo athletes with intellectual disabilities (ID) who participate in international competitions. This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from the past year for 182 judo athletes with ID. Data was collected using a self-reported questionnaire, adapted from previous research, that included questions about injuries impacting training or competition, injury type, mechanism, severity, diagnosis, and location on the body. The injury prevalence among judo athletes with ID occurred most often during training (68.2%) and primarily affected the lower extremities (35%). Age group and injury prevalence were significantly related (χ 2=7.91; P= 0.04), while gender, weight, and ability level were not. Results were closer to those previously reported for conventional judo, which is likely due to the lower practice intensity among judo athletes with ID. Injury prevalence was lower than in prior studies, but the incidence rates aligned when considering training time in judo athletes with ID. Injury burden analysis revealed that females had a lower burden than males, while older athletes experienced a higher burden than younger athletes. Most injuries occur during training, which is likely attributable to safety-focused competition rules.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-518
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume45
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Morales Jose.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Injury Risk Analysis among Judo Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this