Invited but not Selected:The Perceptions of a Mini-Public by Randomly Invited –but not Selected –Citizens

Sophie Devillers, Julien Vrydagh, Didier Caluwaerts, Min Reuchamps

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Random sampling offers an equal chance to all citizens to be randomly invited to a deliberative mini-public. However, a large number of randomly invited citizens usually refuses to participate, which is why larger sample has to be drawn to obtain enough positive responses to compose the mini-public. Then, a second random sampling is operated among the people who accepted to participate, usually along quotas reflecting the population at large. This paper seeks to investigate those people who were randomly invited but finally not selected to participate the citizen panel “Make your Brussels Mobility”. On the first stage, 8000 residents of Brussels were randomly invited. Among them, 377 accepted to participate. On the second stage, 40 citizens were randomly selected to compose the panel. Our paper builds on a survey sent to the 336 citizens who were finally not selected to participate and studies their perceptions of the legitimacy of the citizen panel.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCOST Action 17135
Pages1-24
Number of pages24
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Devillers, Sophie, Vrydagh, Julien, Caluwaerts, Didier& Reuchamps, Min. 2020. “Invited but not Selected: The Perceptions of a Mini-Public by Randomly Invited –but not Selected –Citizens,” January, ConstDelib Working Paper Series, no. 4, pp. 1-21.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Invited but not Selected:The Perceptions of a Mini-Public by Randomly Invited –but not Selected –Citizens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this