Irresponsible neutrality ? Belgian neutrality between doctrine and practice, 1830-1870

Research output: Unpublished contribution to conferenceUnpublished paper

Abstract

This paper discusses the concept of permanent neutrality. I start with Ernest Nys and Edouard Descamps, who reappreciated the country's neutrality in the light of the Congo discussion and of the instauration of a "pacigerate". Then I turn to Wilhelm Arendt, whose 1845 treatise was far more prudent, and emphasised the contingency of the indepdence process in 1830. Finally, I return to diplomatic sources, using the Crimean War (1854-1856) and the War of the Triple Alliance (1864-1870) as instances of practical definition of Belgian obligations under the law of maritime neutrality.
Translated title of the contributionIrresponsible neutrality ?: Belgian neutrality between doctrine and practice, 1830-1870
Original languageFrench
Publication statusUnpublished - 2 Jun 2017
EventJournées internationales de la Société d'histoire du droit: La responsabilité - Université François Rabelais, Tours, France
Duration: 1 Jun 20173 Jun 2017
https://shd2017.sciencesconf.org/

Conference

ConferenceJournées internationales de la Société d'histoire du droit
Abbreviated titleJournées de la SHD
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityTours
Period1/06/173/06/17
Internet address

Keywords

  • legal history
  • history of international law
  • belgian history
  • modern history
  • 19th century
  • European history
  • Doctrine
  • International Relations
  • Crimea
  • Paraguay

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Irresponsible neutrality ? Belgian neutrality between doctrine and practice, 1830-1870'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this