Legitimacy and hegemony: two accounts of non-electoral representation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent theorising on political representation has effectively challenged traditional accounts that located representation in assembled bodies and explained it as the outcome of democratic elections. As a result, and relying on a new conceptual language centred on claim-making, a growing range of political activities, previously labelled as agenda-setting, participation and contestation, are now studied as forms of extra-parliamentary or non-electoral representation. This chapter takes stock of the extant literature and identifies two different ways of looking at non-electoral representation. Each account articulates different normative concerns (democratic legitimacy versus hegemony) and raises different challenges for empirical research.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Political Representation
EditorsMaurizio Cotta, Federico Russo
Place of PublicationCheltenham
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages58-69
Number of pages <span style="color:red"p> <font size="1.5"> ✽ </span> </font>12
ISBN (Electronic)9781788977098
ISBN (Print)9781788977081
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Maurizio Cotta and Federico Russo 2020. All rights reserved.

Copyright:
Copyright 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legitimacy and hegemony: two accounts of non-electoral representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this