Abstract
Background and objectives
The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) was developed for assessing reactions to ambiguous situations, uncertainty, and future events. The IUS has been validated in different languages, but equivocal factor structures, in combination with highly interrelated items and factors, resulted in a redundancy of the items of the English version. In the current study, the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the IUS were examined, and compared with the shortened 12-item version (IUS-12).
Methods
Confirmatory factor analyses were used to investigate different factor structures of both the full and short version of the IUS.
Results
Results indicated that the IUS-12 model with two factors (Prospective Anxiety and Inhibitory Anxiety) provides the best fit. The reduced measure has equally good internal consistency, and is highly correlated with the full version.
Limitations
Future research could investigate whether the current findings generalize to clinical populations.
Conclusion
To summarize, the usage of the short 12-item version of the IUS should be encouraged in future research concerning intolerance of uncertainty.
The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) was developed for assessing reactions to ambiguous situations, uncertainty, and future events. The IUS has been validated in different languages, but equivocal factor structures, in combination with highly interrelated items and factors, resulted in a redundancy of the items of the English version. In the current study, the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the IUS were examined, and compared with the shortened 12-item version (IUS-12).
Methods
Confirmatory factor analyses were used to investigate different factor structures of both the full and short version of the IUS.
Results
Results indicated that the IUS-12 model with two factors (Prospective Anxiety and Inhibitory Anxiety) provides the best fit. The reduced measure has equally good internal consistency, and is highly correlated with the full version.
Limitations
Future research could investigate whether the current findings generalize to clinical populations.
Conclusion
To summarize, the usage of the short 12-item version of the IUS should be encouraged in future research concerning intolerance of uncertainty.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 21-29 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry |
| Volume | 44 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Intolerance of uncertainty
- Confirmatory factor analysis
- Worry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Less is more. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale: Comparison of the full and short version'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver