TY - JOUR
T1 - Lessons learned from shared automated vehicles pilots in Europe
T2 - An evaluation of safety, traffic, and user acceptance
AU - Debbaghi, Fatima Zahra
AU - Rombaut, Evy
AU - Vanhaverbeke, Lieselot
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - In this study, we evaluate the performance of 3 deployment scenarios of shared autonomous mobility in 12 pilot sites from the H2020 SHOW project – Feeder shuttles in open/semi-open environment, Shuttles/buses in closed environment, and shared robotaxis – in terms of road safety, traffic efficiency, and user experience and acceptance using multi-criteria decision analysis approach (TOPSIS). Our results show that the safety performance of the vehicles was positive in the shared robotaxis and shuttles in closed environment scenarios, while the pilots operating in open environments in mixed traffic had more safety incidents. Overall, the ranking of pilot performances in safety and traffic efficiency were not always comparable. Alternatively, the user experience and acceptance was not particularly aligned with the safety and traffic efficiency, as rankings were contrasting. While the users reported dissatisfaction with low operating speeds in most sites, the usefulness, safety and reliability of the services were still valued and perceived positively, particularly in pilot sites with few hard braking events and limited sudden speed changes. The study also highlighted the need for standardization processes in terms of data collection when conducting such an evaluation, as well as the need for contextual and baseline data in future pilots.
AB - In this study, we evaluate the performance of 3 deployment scenarios of shared autonomous mobility in 12 pilot sites from the H2020 SHOW project – Feeder shuttles in open/semi-open environment, Shuttles/buses in closed environment, and shared robotaxis – in terms of road safety, traffic efficiency, and user experience and acceptance using multi-criteria decision analysis approach (TOPSIS). Our results show that the safety performance of the vehicles was positive in the shared robotaxis and shuttles in closed environment scenarios, while the pilots operating in open environments in mixed traffic had more safety incidents. Overall, the ranking of pilot performances in safety and traffic efficiency were not always comparable. Alternatively, the user experience and acceptance was not particularly aligned with the safety and traffic efficiency, as rankings were contrasting. While the users reported dissatisfaction with low operating speeds in most sites, the usefulness, safety and reliability of the services were still valued and perceived positively, particularly in pilot sites with few hard braking events and limited sudden speed changes. The study also highlighted the need for standardization processes in terms of data collection when conducting such an evaluation, as well as the need for contextual and baseline data in future pilots.
KW - Europe
KW - Multi-criteria analysis
KW - Performance indicators
KW - Pilots
KW - Shared automated mobility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005653488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101447
DO - 10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101447
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105005653488
SN - 2213-624X
VL - 20
JO - Case Studies on Transport Policy
JF - Case Studies on Transport Policy
M1 - 101447
ER -