Long-Term Outcome After CRT in the Presence of Mechanical Dyssynchrony Seen With Chronic RV Pacing or Intrinsic LBBB

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the volumetric response and the long- term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with intrinsic left bundle branch block (LBBB) versus chronic right ventricular pacing (RVP) with respect to the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony (MD). BACKGROUND Chronic RVP induces an iatrogenic LBBB and asynchronous left ventricular contraction that is potentially reversible by upgrading to CRT. METHODS A total of 914 patients eligible for CRT (117 with conventional pacemakers and 797 with intrinsic LBBB) were included in the study. MD was visually assessed before CRT and was defined as the presence of either apical rocking and/or septal flash on baseline echocardiograms. Patients with a left ventricular end-systolic volume decrease of >= 15% during the follow-up were considered responders. Patients were followed for all-cause mortality during the median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range: 29 to 66 months). RESULTS MDwas observed in 51% of patientswithRVP versus 77% in patients with intrinsic LBBB( p< 0.001). Patients with RVP and MD had a similar likelihood of volumetric response as did patients with intrinsic LBBB and MD (adjusted odds ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 1.53; p - 0.385). There was no significant difference in long-term survival between patients with RVP and intrinsic LBBB (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.101; 95% confidence interval: 0.658 to 1.842; p = 0.714). Patients with visual MD and either intrinsic LBBB or RVP had a more favorable survival than those without MD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of volumetric response and a favorable long-term survival of patients with RVP was similar to those of patients with intrinsic LBBB and were mainly determined by the presence of MD and not by the nature of LBBB. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.