Abstract
Introduction: With a rapidly aging population, age-neutrality of psychological instruments is becoming ever more important for accurate
assessment of older adults. This study aims to test the age-neutrality of the Dutch Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Approach
System (BIS/BAS) scales by means of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and Differential Test Functioning (DTF) analyses.
Methods: DIF and DTF analyses were conducted using an odds ratio approach. Potential DIF was examined for the two primary
scales and three BAS subscales in 390 Dutch-speaking participants divided over three age groups.
Results: Overall, the BIS-BAS scales lacked age-neutrality when comparing older adults to young adults: eight out of 20 items (ie,
40%) displayed DIF according to the adjusted Bonferroni corrected cut-offs, which exceeds the threshold of 25% for large DIF. Thus,
for 40% of the test items, items were differently endorsed by young and older adults with the same position on the construct measured
by the item. Therefore, the implications of the item-level DIF on the scale level were investigated across age groups. DTF analyses
revealed large DTF for all BIS and BAS scales according to the adjusted Bonferroni corrected cut-offs.
Discussion: DIF found in items on the BIS scale and BAS-Drive and BAS-Fun Seeking scale can probably be explained by
a difference in degree of expression across age groups. A solution could be the development of age-specific norms. DIF on BASReward
Responsiveness subscale could be partly due to measuring a different construct across age groups. Rephrasing or replacing
such items with DIF may increase age-neutrality of the BIS/BAS Scales.
assessment of older adults. This study aims to test the age-neutrality of the Dutch Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Approach
System (BIS/BAS) scales by means of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and Differential Test Functioning (DTF) analyses.
Methods: DIF and DTF analyses were conducted using an odds ratio approach. Potential DIF was examined for the two primary
scales and three BAS subscales in 390 Dutch-speaking participants divided over three age groups.
Results: Overall, the BIS-BAS scales lacked age-neutrality when comparing older adults to young adults: eight out of 20 items (ie,
40%) displayed DIF according to the adjusted Bonferroni corrected cut-offs, which exceeds the threshold of 25% for large DIF. Thus,
for 40% of the test items, items were differently endorsed by young and older adults with the same position on the construct measured
by the item. Therefore, the implications of the item-level DIF on the scale level were investigated across age groups. DTF analyses
revealed large DTF for all BIS and BAS scales according to the adjusted Bonferroni corrected cut-offs.
Discussion: DIF found in items on the BIS scale and BAS-Drive and BAS-Fun Seeking scale can probably be explained by
a difference in degree of expression across age groups. A solution could be the development of age-specific norms. DIF on BASReward
Responsiveness subscale could be partly due to measuring a different construct across age groups. Rephrasing or replacing
such items with DIF may increase age-neutrality of the BIS/BAS Scales.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 16 |
Pages (from-to) | 949-961 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Psychology Research and Behavior Management |
Volume | 16 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Mar 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023, Dove Medical Press Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Personality Systems in Older Adults: Age-Neutrality of the Dutch BIS/BAS Questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Age neutrality of the BIS/BAS questionnaire
Rossi, G. (Creator) & Brancart, X. (Creator), OSF, 2022
https://osf.io/rvdgn/?view_only=d7e4031c26144e729ed1d4084a7acae5
Dataset