Projects per year
Abstract
Whilst cross‐national comparative analyses provide distinct opportunities for the study of gender‐sensitive parliaments, the inherent challenge in conducting comparisons necessitates a continued search for innovative methods. This article responds to this need by proposing the “most significant change” (MSC) approach (Davies & Dart, 2005), which centres on collecting and analysing “stories of significant change.” Drawing on our own application of MSC in an international study commissioned by INTER PARES, we show that MSC’s bottom‐up, inductive, and participatory approach proved valuable in uncovering hitherto unknown instances of gender‐sensitive changes across countries, illuminating the broader impact of such changes beyond parliaments and incorporating practitioners’ perspectives. The flexibility of MSC also enabled context‐specific applications, which we illustrate through three examples from Cyprus, Germany, and Trinidad & Tobago. By offering a complementary approach to compare parliaments’ gender sensitivity across countries, our study provides a novel perspective for future comparative analyses in the field.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 8117 |
Number of pages <span style="color:red"p> <font size="1.5"> ✽ </span> </font> | 18 |
Journal | Politics and Governance |
Volume | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Petra Ahrens\u2019 work was supported by the Academy of Finland, grant number 338556. Silvia Erzeel\u2019s and Merel Fieremans\u2019 work was supported by the Research Foundation\u2013Flanders (FWO), project G040823N.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the author(s).
Projects
- 1 Active
-
FWOAL1083: Ambiguity in the positions of political parties: what causes it and how does it affect voters’ party preferences?
1/01/23 → 31/12/26
Project: Fundamental