Methodologies for identifying and comparing success factors in elite sport policies

Veerle de Bosscher, Maarten van Bottenburg, Simon Shibli

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter outlines the methods explored as part of a large scale project, called the SPLISS study, which is an acronym for Sports Policy factors Leading to International Sporting Success. This study aimed to improve the development of theory concerned with key success factors of an elite sport policy as well as the methods employed to compare elite sport policies more objectively and less descriptively (De Bosscher, 2007; De Bosscher, De Knop, van Bottenburg, Shibli, & Bingham, 2009). To reach this aim, the SPLISS study mirrored the economic literature, where the measurement of world competitiveness is routinely used to provide a framework to assess how nations manage their economic future (e.g. Garelli, 2008; Depperu & Cerrato, 2008; Porter, 1990). This approach was replicated in an elite sport setting to assess how nations manage their future success in international sport competition (De Bosscher, Shibli, van Bottenburg, De Knop, & Truyens, 2010), in an international comparison with six nations (which will be extended in 2012 to a new study involving 15 nations). In this regard, the study was inspired by the way in which economic competitiveness is measured quantitatively as 'the determinants of productivity' and thus it explored the development of a scoring system to analyse and compare elite sport policies of nations as they relate to international sporting success. As competitiveness inherently refers to the relative position of an organization vis-à-vis its competitors (Önsel et al., 2008), international comparisons are the only way to identify and compare the Sports Policy factors Leading to International Sporting Success. Elite sport is therefore seen as 'international by definition' (van Bottenburg, 2000) and an international comparison of a theoretical framework was done in order to improve the development of theory and methodology. Special attention is paid in this chapter to how mixed methods research has made a valuable and suitable contribution to the study and to the evaluation of policies in general and elite sport policies in particular.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of Sport Policy
EditorsIan Henry, Ling-mei Ko
Place of PublicationLondon & New York
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages197-211
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9780203807217
ISBN (Print)9780415666619
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2013

Publication series

NameRoutledge International Handbooks
PublisherRoutledge

Bibliographical note

Ian Henry and Ling-Mei Ko (Eds.)

Keywords

  • elite sport policy
  • elite sport success

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodologies for identifying and comparing success factors in elite sport policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this