Abstract
The Katari River Basin, the most densely populated basin in Bolivia, discharges into Lake Titicaca, the world’s highest
navigable lake and a crucial water resource in the Andes. Despite its significance, the basin suffers from severe water contamination
because of anthropogenic activities. This pollution adversely affects water quality, distribution, and availability, exacerbating the region’s
vulnerability to the impacts of climate change at high elevations. In response to these challenges, the Bolivian government established
a multi-stakeholder platform. However, this platform reveals complex water conflict dynamics linked to ambiguity associated with
different ways of knowing, framing, and coping with water pollution issues. This study examines how relational practices are linked to
managing ambiguity and addressing nested water conflicts. Relational practices are communication-based practices by which the
involved actors shape and develop mutual and shared sense-making relationships. Our findings reveal that current relational practices
hinder their ability to collaboratively address ambiguities, leaving underlying water conflicts unresolved. Moreover, they indicate that
ambiguity is managed by imposing a singular frame, reinforced by the significant power asymmetries within the multi-stakeholder
platform, strengthening the dynamics of water conflicts. We conclude that dealing with ambiguity through high-quality relational
practices could facilitate the recognition and resolution of water conflicts, potentially improving clarity, communication, and advancing
collaborative problem-solving among stakeholders.
navigable lake and a crucial water resource in the Andes. Despite its significance, the basin suffers from severe water contamination
because of anthropogenic activities. This pollution adversely affects water quality, distribution, and availability, exacerbating the region’s
vulnerability to the impacts of climate change at high elevations. In response to these challenges, the Bolivian government established
a multi-stakeholder platform. However, this platform reveals complex water conflict dynamics linked to ambiguity associated with
different ways of knowing, framing, and coping with water pollution issues. This study examines how relational practices are linked to
managing ambiguity and addressing nested water conflicts. Relational practices are communication-based practices by which the
involved actors shape and develop mutual and shared sense-making relationships. Our findings reveal that current relational practices
hinder their ability to collaboratively address ambiguities, leaving underlying water conflicts unresolved. Moreover, they indicate that
ambiguity is managed by imposing a singular frame, reinforced by the significant power asymmetries within the multi-stakeholder
platform, strengthening the dynamics of water conflicts. We conclude that dealing with ambiguity through high-quality relational
practices could facilitate the recognition and resolution of water conflicts, potentially improving clarity, communication, and advancing
collaborative problem-solving among stakeholders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 15 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Ecology and Society : A Journal of Integrative Science for Resilience and Sustainability |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025, Resilience Alliance. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- ambiguity; multi-stakeholder management; nested conflicts; relational practices; sustainability; water governance