Non-communicable disease risk associated with red and processed meat consumption—magnitude, certainty, and contextuality of risk?

Bradley Johnston, Stefaan De Smet, Frédéric Leroy, Andrew Mente, Alice V. Stanton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mean global intakes per person of red and processed meats are 51 and 17 g/day respectively. Consumption is lowest in South Asia (7 and 3 g/d), and highest in Central Europe/Asia (114 and 54 g/d). While some researchers claim that red meat consumption is intrinsically harmful, the evidence does not support this being the case where intakes are below 75 and 20 g/d, respectively. Even beyond these intake levels, only small increases in relative risks are reported (<25%), there is little to no effect on absolute risk, and the certainty of evidence remains low to very low based on the best available summary evidence. Importantly the relationship is not necessarily causal - when meat consumption is part of healthy dietary patterns, harmful associations tend to disappear, suggesting that risk is more likely to be contingent on the dietary context rather than meat itself.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-27
Number of pages9
JournalAnimal Frontiers
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • certainty
  • meat
  • mortality
  • noncommunicable diseases
  • public health
  • risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-communicable disease risk associated with red and processed meat consumption—magnitude, certainty, and contextuality of risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this