Politics, Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism in Times of Globalisation.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In this paper I reconstruct the historical significance of the concept of sovereignty and I defend its relevance against the critique of Hannah Arendt. I argue that sovereignty, understood as the concept that expresses the normative unity of the legal order, is not incompatible with plurality and constitutionalism and that it was the condition of possibility of the formation of inter state law. Further I criticize the abstract moralism that characterizes today's cosmopolitanism and the paradigm of global governance. Although the significance of sovereignty is shifting in the context of globalisation, it is not becoming irrelevant because it symbolizes the right of political self-determination of a community as well as the capacity to transfer some portion of its regulatory competence to a supra-national legal order.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)477-497
Number of pages20
JournalArchiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008


  • Sovereignty
  • Cosmopolitanism
  • Globalisation
  • Philosophy of law
  • History of ideas


Dive into the research topics of 'Politics, Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism in Times of Globalisation.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this