Pregnancy termination at a viable stage in daily clinical practice: A nationwide mortality follow-back study in Flanders, Belgium

Ellen Roets, Kim Beernaert, Kenneth Chambaere, Luc Deliens, Kim van Berkel, Luc DeCatte, Sophie Vanhaesebrouck, Kristien Roelens, Laure Dombrecht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Congenital malformations are frequently diagnosed prenatally even at a viable stage. No adequate registration of incidence and characteristics of late termination of pregnancy (TOP) or abortion for medical reasons exists in Flanders. Methods: Nationwide mortality follow-back survey sent to physicians signing death certificates of all stillbirths for 22 weeks gestation onward (September 2016–December 2017) in Flanders, Belgium. Questions measured whether late TOP preceded stillbirth, and which clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were indicated. Questionnaire data were linked with sociodemographic information from death certificates. Results: Response rate was 56% (203/366). 38% of stillbirths (77/203) concerned late TOP. In 88.3% of late TOPs, physicians classified congenital anomalies of the foetus as serious or very serious (incompatibility with life outside the womb or severe neurological or physical impairment). In 26% of cases, late TOP was first suggested by the physician rather than spontaneously requested by parents (73%). 88% of late TOPs were discussed in open team meetings. Conclusions: 2/5 stillbirths were preceded by late TOP, indicating severe underreportation by existing registrations and a dire need for adequate registration methods. Although late TOP was most often explicitly requested by parents, in ¼ cases termination was suggested first by physicians. Parents are sometimes hesitant to bring up late TOP themselves, indicating that TOP should always be counselled as an equivalent option.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)781-791
Number of pages <span style="color:red"p> <font size="1.5"> ✽ </span> </font>11
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume43
Issue number6
Early online date26 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We would like to thank all physicians and neonatal intensive care units that participated in this study, as well as the physicians and experts who aided in testing and validating the questionnaire. We are grateful for the support and cooperation of the Flemish Agency for Care and Health without whom data‐collection would not have been possible, and for the aid of lawyer Wim De Brock and Prof. Dr. Robert Vander Stichele in ensuring the anonymity of all participants. This work is funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; G041716N) and the special research fund of Ghent University (BOF; 01J06915). K. Beernaert is a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO). The study sponsors played no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Copyright:
Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • pregnancy termination
  • mortality
  • Flanders
  • congenital malformation
  • abortion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pregnancy termination at a viable stage in daily clinical practice: A nationwide mortality follow-back study in Flanders, Belgium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this