Prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular function (a report from the Belgian Multicenter registry on dyssynchrony).

Johan De Sutter, Nico Van De Veire, L. Muyldermans, Tibaut Debacker, E. Hoffer, M. Vaerenberg, B. Paelinck, P. Decoodt, L. Gabriel, T. Gillebert, Guy Van Camp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract: The present study evaluated the prevalence of mechanical inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF). We studied 138 patients with heart failure (age 67 +/- 11 years; 76% men); 60 patients had preserved LVEF (> 40%). Using conventional Doppler echocardiography, an interventricular mechanical delay >= 40 ms was defined as interventricular dyssynchrony. Using pulse-wave tissue Doppler imaging, the time from the beginning of the QRS complex to onset of systolic motion was measured in 4 basal LV segments. A dispersion of >= 60 ms was defined as intraventricular dyssynchrony. The prevalence of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony was lower in patients with preserved LVEF than in those with reduced LVEF (17% vs 41%, p <0.01 for interventricular dyssynchrony, 18% vs 36%, p <0.01 for intraventricular dyssynchrony). However, patients with preserved LVEF and a QRS width >= 120 ms had higher values for the parameters for inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony than patients with a QRS width <120 ms (interventricular mechanical delay 33 +/- 20 vs 20 +/- 16 ms, p <0.05; tissue Doppler imaging dispersion 42 +/- 26 vs 33 22 ms, p <0.05). In patients with a QRS width >= 120 ms, the prevalence of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony was comparable for patients with preserved and reduced LVEF (42% vs 55%, p = NS for interventricular dyssynchrony and 45% vs 46%, p = NS for intraventricular dyssynchrony). In conclusion, the prevalence of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony was low (17% and 18%, respectively) in patients with heart failure and preserved LVEF. However, in the presence of a QRS width of >= 120 ms, this prevalence increased to almost 50%, comparable to that for patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF and a QRS width of >= 120 ms. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1543-1548
Number of pages6
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume96
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2005

Keywords

  • CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
  • ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
  • INTRAVENTRICULAR DYSSYNCHRONY
  • EJECTION FRACTION
  • CONDUCTION DELAY
  • ASYNCHRONY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular function (a report from the Belgian Multicenter registry on dyssynchrony).'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this