Prevalence of pain phenotypes and co-morbidities of chronic pain in Parkinson's Disease

Hannah A Thomas, Lisa Goudman, Marisa DiMarzio, Grace Barron, Julie G Pilitsis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of chronic pain in Parkinson's disease (PD) in neurology practices ranges from 24 % to 83 %. To determine whether this prevalence is accurate across patients with PD, we leveraged data from electronic medical records in 80 inpatient and outpatient general practice settings.

METHODS: We explored the prevalence of chronic pain in patients with PD relative to age and sex-matched controls in a large international database with electronic medical records from over 250 million patients (TriNetX Cambridge, MA, USA). We described demographics, co-morbid conditions and medication differences between patients with PD and without PD who have chronic pain.

RESULTS: Extracted data included 4510 patients with PD and 4,214,982 age-matched control patients without Parkinson's Disease. A chronic pain diagnosis was identified in 19.3 % of males and 22.8 % of females with PD. This differed significantly from age-matched patients without PD who had a significantly lower prevalence of chronic pain 3.78 % and 4.76 %. Significantly more PD patients (both male and females) had received tramadol, oxycodone, and neuropathic agents (p<0.001) than patients without PD. Females with PD more often received anti-depressants than males with PD (p<0.05), corresponding with a significantly higher prevalence of depression.

CONCLUSION: Chronic pain in patients with PD is five times as common as in age-matched controls in general practice settings. Patients with PD have a greater prevalence of comorbid conditions that affect development of chronic pain. Whether the pain or the PD is causative to those conditions remains to be elucidated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108563
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume246
Early online date16 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite this