Abstract
Objectives: Diabetes type 2 affects daily life, yet the psychosocial needs of patients are often overlooked. This
study examines how these needs are addressed during consultations.
Method: A qualitative ethnographic study based on 47 non-participatory observations of diabetes consultations at
an outpatient academic diabetes specialist centre located in a European metropolitan capital was conducted and
thematically analysed using the Making Care Fit framework.
Results: Consultations focused mainly on medical aspects, while psychosocial aspects were rarely discussed.
Although patients raised emotional burdens, frustrations, or shame, these concerns were rarely explored in
depth. Only work-related problems were further discussed. The unique life context of patients was also rarely
integrated into the care plan. Although relatives were sometimes present and clearly played a supportive role,
their perspective was not actively considered. The conversation was largely provider-driven, giving patients little
say in final decisions. Time constraints reinforced the focus on clinical tasks, and follow-up needs were rarely
addressed.
Conclusions: By directly observing real-time interactions, this study reveals how psychosocial needs become
deprioritized in routine daily practice despite current insights emphasizing person-centered care.
Implications for practice: Acknowledging the structural constraints that shape the tension between biomedical
demands and relational care, improving alignment between current diabetes care and the lived experiences of
patients and their relatives will require sufficient time, a more dialogical consultation style, and systematic
screening for psychosocial issues.
study examines how these needs are addressed during consultations.
Method: A qualitative ethnographic study based on 47 non-participatory observations of diabetes consultations at
an outpatient academic diabetes specialist centre located in a European metropolitan capital was conducted and
thematically analysed using the Making Care Fit framework.
Results: Consultations focused mainly on medical aspects, while psychosocial aspects were rarely discussed.
Although patients raised emotional burdens, frustrations, or shame, these concerns were rarely explored in
depth. Only work-related problems were further discussed. The unique life context of patients was also rarely
integrated into the care plan. Although relatives were sometimes present and clearly played a supportive role,
their perspective was not actively considered. The conversation was largely provider-driven, giving patients little
say in final decisions. Time constraints reinforced the focus on clinical tasks, and follow-up needs were rarely
addressed.
Conclusions: By directly observing real-time interactions, this study reveals how psychosocial needs become
deprioritized in routine daily practice despite current insights emphasizing person-centered care.
Implications for practice: Acknowledging the structural constraints that shape the tension between biomedical
demands and relational care, improving alignment between current diabetes care and the lived experiences of
patients and their relatives will require sufficient time, a more dialogical consultation style, and systematic
screening for psychosocial issues.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 109639 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Patient Education and Counseling |
| Volume | 149 |
| Issue number | 109639 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 Elsevier B.V.
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver