Public Voice in Privacy Governance: Lessons from Environmental Democracy

Dariusz Kloza

doi:10.5281/zenodo.6992200

Public Voice in Privacy Governance: Lessons from Environmental Democracy

Dariusz Kloza

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review

184 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Departing from a need to remedy the insufficient participation of stakeholders in the governance of privacy, and in particular in privacy impact assessment (PIA), this paper proposes the adaptation of the so-called environmental democracy, of which the 1998 Aarhus Convention is the most recent and most important formalisation, to the needs and reality of privacy, thus creating the "privacy democracy". Such a framework would comprise three enforceable rights: to access privacy-related information, to take part in privacy-related decision-making in specific situations and to seek remedy should the two previous rights be violated. The experience of the functioning of environmental democracy would offer invaluable insight for the implementation of its privacy counterpart.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	KnowRight 2012
Subtitle of host publication	Knowledge Rights - Legal, Societal and Related Technological Aspects
Editors	Erich Schweighofer, Ahti Saarenpää, Janos Böszörmenyi
Place of Publication	Vienna
Publisher	Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft
Pages	119-144
Number of pages	26
ISBN (Print)	978-3-85403-299-1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6992200
Publication status	Published - 31 Dec 2013
Event	The Public Voice: Privacy Rights are a Global Challenge - Punta del Este, Uruguay Duration: 22 Oct 2012 → 22 Oct 2012 https://thepublicvoice.org/PVevents/uruguay12/

Conference

Conference	The Public Voice: Privacy Rights are a Global Challenge
Country/Territory	Uruguay
City	Punta del Este
Period	22/10/12 → 22/10/12
Internet address	https://thepublicvoice.org/PVevents/uruguay12/

Keywords

privacy
data protection
privacy impact assessment
environmental impact assessment
public participation
environmental democracy
Aarhus Convention
PIA
EIA

Access to Document

10.5281/zenodo.6992200

kloza_2013_public_voice_in_pia
Pre-print.
Submitted manuscript, 672 KB

EU367: PIAF: A Privacy Impact Assessment Framework for Data Protection and Privacy Rights
De Hert, P., De Hert, P. & Kloza, D.
1/01/11 → 31/10/12
Project: Fundamental

The public voice in privacy impact assessment: what could be learnt from international environmental law?
Dariusz Kloza (Speaker)
22 Oct 2012
Activity: Talk or presentation › Talk or presentation at a conference

File

Cite this

@inbook{423004f1f45e4d368dd78f21f32b4c8e,

title = "Public Voice in Privacy Governance: Lessons from Environmental Democracy",

abstract = "Departing from a need to remedy the insufficient participation of stakeholders in the governance of privacy, and in particular in privacy impact assessment (PIA), this paper proposes the adaptation of the so-called environmental democracy, of which the 1998 Aarhus Convention is the most recent and most important formalisation, to the needs and reality of privacy, thus creating the {"}privacy democracy{"}. Such a framework would comprise three enforceable rights: to access privacy-related information, to take part in privacy-related decision-making in specific situations and to seek remedy should the two previous rights be violated. The experience of the functioning of environmental democracy would offer invaluable insight for the implementation of its privacy counterpart.",

keywords = "privacy, data protection, privacy impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, public participation, environmental democracy, Aarhus Convention, PIA, EIA",

author = "Dariusz Kloza",

note = "Erich Schweighofer, Ahti Saarenp{\"a}{\"a}, Janos B{\"o}sz{\"o}rmenyi; The Public Voice: Privacy Rights are a Global Challenge ; Conference date: 22-10-2012 Through 22-10-2012",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

day = "31",

doi = "10.5281/zenodo.6992200",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-85403-299-1",

pages = "119--144",

editor = "Erich Schweighofer and Ahti Saarenp{\"a}{\"a} and Janos B{\"o}sz{\"o}rmenyi",

booktitle = "KnowRight 2012",

publisher = "{\"O}sterreichische Computer Gesellschaft",

url = "https://thepublicvoice.org/PVevents/uruguay12/",

}

Kloza, D 2013, Public Voice in Privacy Governance: Lessons from Environmental Democracy. in E Schweighofer, A Saarenpää & J Böszörmenyi (eds), KnowRight 2012: Knowledge Rights - Legal, Societal and Related Technological Aspects. Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft, Vienna, pp. 119-144, The Public Voice: Privacy Rights are a Global Challenge, Punta del Este, Uruguay, 22/10/12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6992200

Public Voice in Privacy Governance: Lessons from Environmental Democracy. / Kloza, Dariusz.
KnowRight 2012: Knowledge Rights - Legal, Societal and Related Technological Aspects. ed. / Erich Schweighofer; Ahti Saarenpää; Janos Böszörmenyi. Vienna: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft, 2013. p. 119-144.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Public Voice in Privacy Governance: Lessons from Environmental Democracy

AU - Kloza, Dariusz

N1 - Erich Schweighofer, Ahti Saarenpää, Janos Böszörmenyi

PY - 2013/12/31

Y1 - 2013/12/31

N2 - Departing from a need to remedy the insufficient participation of stakeholders in the governance of privacy, and in particular in privacy impact assessment (PIA), this paper proposes the adaptation of the so-called environmental democracy, of which the 1998 Aarhus Convention is the most recent and most important formalisation, to the needs and reality of privacy, thus creating the "privacy democracy". Such a framework would comprise three enforceable rights: to access privacy-related information, to take part in privacy-related decision-making in specific situations and to seek remedy should the two previous rights be violated. The experience of the functioning of environmental democracy would offer invaluable insight for the implementation of its privacy counterpart.

AB - Departing from a need to remedy the insufficient participation of stakeholders in the governance of privacy, and in particular in privacy impact assessment (PIA), this paper proposes the adaptation of the so-called environmental democracy, of which the 1998 Aarhus Convention is the most recent and most important formalisation, to the needs and reality of privacy, thus creating the "privacy democracy". Such a framework would comprise three enforceable rights: to access privacy-related information, to take part in privacy-related decision-making in specific situations and to seek remedy should the two previous rights be violated. The experience of the functioning of environmental democracy would offer invaluable insight for the implementation of its privacy counterpart.

KW - privacy

KW - data protection

KW - privacy impact assessment

KW - environmental impact assessment

KW - public participation

KW - environmental democracy

KW - Aarhus Convention

KW - PIA

KW - EIA

U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.6992200

DO - 10.5281/zenodo.6992200

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-85403-299-1

SP - 119

EP - 144

BT - KnowRight 2012

A2 - Schweighofer, Erich

A2 - Saarenpää, Ahti

A2 - Böszörmenyi, Janos

PB - Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft

CY - Vienna

T2 - The Public Voice: Privacy Rights are a Global Challenge

Y2 - 22 October 2012 through 22 October 2012

ER -

Public Voice in Privacy Governance: Lessons from Environmental Democracy

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

EU367: PIAF: A Privacy Impact Assessment Framework for Data Protection and Privacy Rights

Activities

The public voice in privacy impact assessment: what could be learnt from international environmental law?

Cite this