Putting the European Parliament's gender exceptionalism to the test: MEPs’ specialisation in masculine and feminine policy domains in parliamentary questions

Jeremy Dodeigne, Silvia Erzeel, François Randour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The European Parliament is often presented as a success story regarding women's representation. Yet, recent studies observe gendered patterns in parliamentary behaviour. This article contributes to this scholarship by studying gender differences in MEPs’ parliamentary behaviour on ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ policy domains. Analysing 136,787 parliamentary questions over 25 years (1994–2019), the study reveals moderate gender differences in MEPs’ behaviour. Moreover, gender differences are influenced by seniority and women's numerical presence in the European Parliament's political groups. Gender-stereotypical policy foci are more pronounced among newcomers and disappear for experienced MEPs. In political groups with fewer women, seniority is key for women MEPs seeking engagement in masculine policy domains. Overall, our findings underscore the interplay between gender, seniority, and women's presence in shaping MEPs’ parliamentary behaviour within the European Parliament’s gendered context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-30
Number of pages <span style="color:red"p> <font size="1.5"> ✽ </span> </font>30
JournalEuropean Union Politics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project benefited from funding support of Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique \u2013 FNRS. Grant Number: PDR T.0076.20 (35292892). The study was also supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) under grant G040823N.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Cite this