Radbruch on the Origins of the Criminal Law: Punitive Interventions before Sovereignty

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter is dedicated to Radbruch's seminal text on 'The origin of criminal law in the class of serfts'. It contains a number of counter intuitive insights on the relationship between public punishment and private revenge, derived from the domains of legal history and anthropological research in non-state societies. Radbruch's aim was not to provide a historiography of punitive interventions in tribal Germanic society, but to remind his readers of the constitutive importance of sovereignty for the emergence of criminal law. This relates to Radbruch's concern for legal certainty, and explains his inquiries into the continuity and discontinuities between the pater familias of the Germanic clan and the institution of the sovereign. My own investigations could similarly be understood as a kind of 'historical jurisprudence', highlighting the significance of the mutation that occurred when punitive interventions between equals (private revenge) were prohibited and became themselves punishable as criminal offences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationFoundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law
    EditorsMarkus D. Dubber
    Place of PublicationOxford
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages219-238
    Number of pages19
    ISBN (Print)978-0-19-967361-2
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Bibliographical note

    Markus D. Dubber

    Keywords

    • history of punishment
    • public criminal law
    • private revenge
    • non-state society
    • suzerainty
    • sovereignty
    • monopoly of violence
    • Rule of Law
    • pater familias

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Radbruch on the Origins of the Criminal Law: Punitive Interventions before Sovereignty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this