Projects per year
Abstract
This article discusses how merchants or skippers suffering losses aimed to get redress for damages in trading and shipping from or with Holland and Zeeland in the fourteenth and early fifteenth century within the context of Anglo–Dutch trade and diplomacy. In accordance with legal doctrine both the English king and the Count of Holland considered reprisal as an ultimate remedy. Both rulers used the possibility of reprisal as a means of pressure within Anglo–Dutch diplomacy. Their willingness to support their subjects went beyond the issue of damage redress as it also enabled them to have more control over their subjects. When reprisal was eventually issued, rulers on both sides of the Channel carefully supervised and controlled its procedures. Even though rulers were prepared to support victims via diplomacy and, ultimately, reprisal, they did consider individual interests in the functioning of the wider political and economic interests of their countries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 53-71 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Comparative Legal History |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - May 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reprisal and diplomacy: conflict resolution within the context of Anglo–Dutch commercial relations c1300–c1415'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
SRP58: SRP-Onderzoekszwaartepunt: Inequality, Migration and Social Relations in Urban Brabant and Flanders, c. 1350-1914
Winter, A., Ryckbosch, W. & Deneweth, H.
1/03/19 → 29/02/24
Project: Fundamental