Reputation Shocks and Recovery in Public-Serving Organizations: The Moderating Effect of Mission Valence

Jurgen Willems, Lewis Faulk, Silke Boenigk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of negative and positive signals on public-serving organizations’ reputations. We draw on sociocognitive perspectives to test how organizations’ breaches of stakeholders’ trust are repairable over time as well as the moderating effect of organizational mission valence on this forgiveness process. Multilevel data from two slope-shift experiments (n = 304; n = 582) show that mission valence, or individuals’ affinity with an organization’s mission, intensifies the effects of both negative and positive signals in organizations’ reputation building processes. Negative signals have stronger negative effects on intentions to support the organization for individuals with high mission valence. However, the effect of successive positive signals is also stronger for individuals with high mission valence, suggesting greater forgiveness following a stronger breach of trust among these stakeholders.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbermuaa041
Pages (from-to)311-327
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reputation Shocks and Recovery in Public-Serving Organizations: The Moderating Effect of Mission Valence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this