Sensitive economic personae and functional human beings: A critical metaphor analysis of EU policy documents between 1985 and 2014

Nicole Dewandre, Orsolya Gulyas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study is aimed at unveiling the implicit assumptions underlying the language of EU policy-making, drawing on Hannah Arendt’s critique of modernity. It conducts a critical metaphor analysis of strategic EU policy documents from 1985 to 2014 to reveal the extent to which EU policy-making, by relentlessly focusing on the ‘competitiveness, growth, and jobs’ narrative, relies on modern conceptual frameworks. These are characterized by the prominence of rationality and causality, at the expense of sense of purpose, reality and meaning, which is revealed through the validation of four metaphorical keys. These are (i) SENSITIVE INVERSION, i.e. ECONOMIC AGENTS ARE SENSITIVE and HUMANS ARE FUNCTIONAL; (ii) SIZE MATTERS, i.e. BIG IS BETTER THAN SMALL and ONE IS BETTER THAN MANY; (iii) DEFICIT FRAMING, i.e. POTENTIAL IS LOCKED and PRESENT IS BROKEN/FUTURE IS BRIGHT; and (iv) SPEED IS OF THE ESSENCE, i.e. THE WORLD MOVES FAST and WE MUST HURRY UP.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)831-857
JournalJournal of Language and Politics
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • critical discourse analysis
  • metaphor
  • European Union
  • policy
  • Lisbon Strategy
  • Hannah Arendt

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitive economic personae and functional human beings: A critical metaphor analysis of EU policy documents between 1985 and 2014'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this