Projects per year
RESEARCH QUESTION: Which cryopreservation method better protects reproductive potential: the cryopreservation of a testicular cell suspension (TCS) or the cryopreservation of testicular tissue (TET)?
DESIGN: Two cryopreservation strategies for spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) were compared in a mouse model: cryopreservation as TET or as TCS. Evaluated outcomes were number of viable cells after thawing, number and length of donor-derived colonies after spermatogonial stem cell transplantation (SSCT), number of litters, litter size and number of donor-derived pups after mating.
RESULTS: Compared with cryopreserving TCS, cryopreservation of TET resulted in significantly higher numbers of viable cells after thawing (TET: 13.4 × 104 ± 7.2 × 104 versus TCS: 8.2 × 104 ± 2.7 × 104; P = 0.0002), more (TET: 47.6 ± 19.2 versus TCS: 18.5 ± 13.0; P = 0.0039) and longer (TET: 5.2 ± 1.0 mm versus TCS: 2.7 ± 1.5 mm; P = 0.0016) donor-derived colonies, and more donor-derived pups per litter (TET: 2.2 ± 0.2 versus TCS: 0.5 ± 0.1; P = 0.0008).
CONCLUSIONS: Cryopreservation of TET is the preferred method to cryopreserve SSCs prior to SSCT in a mouse model.
Bibliographical noteCopyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Testicular tissue cryopreservation is the preferred method to preserve spermatogonial stem cells prior to transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Finished