The conditionality of EU freedom of movement: Normative change in the discourse of EU institutions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Freedom of movement (FOM) in the European Union (EU) has become a highly salient issue in political and public debates. Most of the literature on FOM is heavily focused on the judiciary interpretation of this EU right, or on conflicting attitudes towards FOM within the national arena. However, the EU and its institutions as political actors that define and shape the content and meaning of FOM are largely absent from this literature. If mentioned, EU actors are often depicted as ideological and orthodox defenders of FOM. We argue that this perspective is empirically inaccurate, which leads to skewed theoretical assumptions. It not only overlooks an EU-level discourse on FOM that has changed significantly in recent years but also fails to acknowledge that even fundamental rights and key pillars of EU integration can be subject to discursive change at the EU level. A frame analysis of documents from the European Commission, the European Council, the Council of the EU and the European Parliament from 2004 to 2016 forms the basis of our argument. During this period, restrictionist arguments have increasingly entered EU actors’ discourse on FOM. Viewed almost as an absolute right of EU citizens during the 2000s, FOM during the 2010s has been framed in terms of the conditions underlying the exercise of this right. We conclude that EU actors are engaged in a political debate over what FOM means and that their discourse has shifted to support an increased conditionality of FOM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-78
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of European Social Policy
Volume30
Issue number1
Early online date2 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Feb 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Valuable feedback on earlier and later versions of this article was provided by Eamonn Butler at the CES Conference in Chicago, Oliver Eberl at the General Conference of the ECPR in Hamburg, Veit Bader at a ZiF workshop at University of Bielefeld and two anonymous reviewers. Research assistance by Alina Anapyanova and Esther Bleys at the Institute for European Studies at Vrije Universiteit Brussel as well as editorial assistance of Laura Cunniff at Europa-Universität Flensburg is gratefully acknowledged. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The conditionality of EU freedom of movement: Normative change in the discourse of EU institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this