The Governance of Public–Nonprofit Service Networks: A Comparison Between Three Types of Governance Roles

Peter Raeymaeckers, Caroline Vermeiren, Charlotte Noël, Stijn van Puyvelde, Jurgen Willems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this research, we focus on the governance role of the coordinator affiliated to the leading agency in public–nonprofit service networks. We analyze the extent to which different types of coordinators are able to build consensus on a set of network goals in close collaboration with the nonprofit network partners. We explore three network cases, respectively, coordinated by a commissioner, a co-producer and a facilitator. Both network coordinators and respondents from participating nonprofit service agencies are interviewed. In contrast to earlier studies our analysis indicates that, in comparison with a facilitator, a commissioner and a co-producer are better equipped to reach consensus on a set of goals in service networks. The practice of synthesis is considered as very important when establishing consensus in a network.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1037-1048
Number of pages12
JournalVoluntas
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Keywords

  • Governance roles
  • Network coordinator
  • Network governance
  • Public–nonprofit
  • Qualitative research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Governance of Public–Nonprofit Service Networks: A Comparison Between Three Types of Governance Roles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this