Abstract
Public sector professions are highly gender-dominant (e.g., police officers, teachers) and determined not only by professionals but also by gender roles. According to the role congruity theory, these social roles result in perceived (in)congruities between the jobholders' gender and gender-dominant professions. This research investigates this intersection for several professions. Throughout three large-scale surveys (conducted in Austria), we first document the gender dominance of various public sector professions, and further analyze the effects from (in)congruities in gender-dominant professions. The findings are two-fold: First, for police officers, firefighters, politicians, nurses, and teachers, (in)congruities of job-holder's gender with gender dominance of the profession result in positive (negative) ascriptions of job-related traits. However, (in)congruity effects are not confirmed for other gender-dominant professions outside the public sector. Second, no (in)congruity effects are found for perceived professionalism. Findings are important for policy makers, as well as recruiters and employers who aim to reduce gender-related disadvantages within public sector employment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 519-543 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Public Administration Review |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was funded in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P36098\u2010G: Episodic citizenship, reputation and stereotypes].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Public Administration Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Public Administration.